Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-25 19:32:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A6242D54069B55B3DBFD4C362452EEF351F92E69ED6958F8B21F458208066EBD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet claims something that did not occur. Piaget doesn't define an age for the FOS. The theory has served as the basis for modern theories, but has been criticized in peer review for sampling failures n' for ignoring neurodiv n' environmental factors. I recommend the note above.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1639602956461801472
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A6242D54069B55B3DBFD4C362452EEF351F92E69ED6958F8B21F458208066EBD
  • createdAtMillis - 1679772744564
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1639602956461801472A6242D54069B55B3DBFD4C362452EEF351F92E69ED6958F8B21F458208066EBD