Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-25 17:23:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8417C759E7EF6430B7C1D9EE1E1E0DA0AAC89DB8467DEF1047BC8DC1E5F3F7C9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet claims something that did not occur. Piaget doesn't define an age for the FOS. The theory has served as the basis for modern theories, but has been criticized in peer review for sampling failures n' for ignoring neurodiv n' environmental factors. I recommend the note above.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1639602956461801472
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8417C759E7EF6430B7C1D9EE1E1E0DA0AAC89DB8467DEF1047BC8DC1E5F3F7C9
  • createdAtMillis - 1679764998366
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16396029564618014728417C759E7EF6430B7C1D9EE1E1E0DA0AAC89DB8467DEF1047BC8DC1E5F3F7C9