Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-25 23:45:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 506D3A31B0608C800EBCA2B1626CFED150F1649EE0D0A6284088A1F6943CB860
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet claims something that did not occur. Piaget doesn't define an age for the FOS. The theory has served as the basis for modern theories, but has been criticized in peer review for sampling failures n' for ignoring neurodiv n' environmental factors. I recommend the note above.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1639602956461801472
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 506D3A31B0608C800EBCA2B1626CFED150F1649EE0D0A6284088A1F6943CB860
  • createdAtMillis - 1679787936200
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1639602956461801472506D3A31B0608C800EBCA2B1626CFED150F1649EE0D0A6284088A1F6943CB860