Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-26 12:19:53 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 091FB8651EB8B4A0D428CED21E7AD4C0DF0253DB24867FD732D0D619A2EA739E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet claims something that did not occur. Piaget doesn't define an age for the FOS. The theory has served as the basis for modern theories, but has been criticized in peer review for sampling failures n' for ignoring neurodiv n' environmental factors. I recommend the note above.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1639602956461801472
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 091FB8651EB8B4A0D428CED21E7AD4C0DF0253DB24867FD732D0D619A2EA739E
  • createdAtMillis - 1679833193054
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1639602956461801472091FB8651EB8B4A0D428CED21E7AD4C0DF0253DB24867FD732D0D619A2EA739E