Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-25 02:39:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 345078A4DD197B620A8DEB6E68C58035B77570D9E34821A17E4028A942420EAE
Participant Details

Original Note:

All the information about the person who made the comment, their apology, and the (conservative) conference are included in the linked article. One suggested note even uses the same article as a source for more context- which means the context is there. Notes not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1639434546012913666
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 345078A4DD197B620A8DEB6E68C58035B77570D9E34821A17E4028A942420EAE
  • createdAtMillis - 1679711969644
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1639434546012913666345078A4DD197B620A8DEB6E68C58035B77570D9E34821A17E4028A942420EAE