Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-24 20:46:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B83417F7080A401FEA3286FC34B8D9779081D18D7680D0C79C4B76A74D6CA0D3
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://twitter.com/kijibato_hato/status/1636620580534493184 上記リプライにもあるように、これはあくまで破壊調査があったことからその橋に不正な建築の疑いがかけられていることを心配するものであり、破壊調査による橋の強度の低下などを訴えるものではない。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1639269748419575808
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B83417F7080A401FEA3286FC34B8D9779081D18D7680D0C79C4B76A74D6CA0D3
  • createdAtMillis - 1679690816268
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1639269748419575808B83417F7080A401FEA3286FC34B8D9779081D18D7680D0C79C4B76A74D6CA0D3