Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-24 21:49:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F2F9967179C313183D612D6365301CBB339C4F491B08D4FFA61FB85342EC671D
Participant Details

Original Note:

As alegações do autor não são verificadas e não possuem fonte confiável de embasamento. A empresa acusada de trabalho infantil é chinesa, enquanto a imagem que ilustra as alegações, pertence a um banco de imagem de Bangladesh, outro país do oriente, sem relação com a empresa. https://www.gettyimages.com.br/fotos/no-child-labor-day-in-bangladesh

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1639268926142988289
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F2F9967179C313183D612D6365301CBB339C4F491B08D4FFA61FB85342EC671D
  • createdAtMillis - 1679694586344
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1639268926142988289F2F9967179C313183D612D6365301CBB339C4F491B08D4FFA61FB85342EC671D