Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-25 03:32:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 780436A16DAF7033B413E10E5DA6330D6D45343792D707193FD5A95A103B2CC1
Participant Details

Original Note:

As alegações do autor não são verificadas e não possuem fonte confiável de embasamento. A empresa acusada de trabalho infantil é chinesa, enquanto a imagem que ilustra as alegações, pertence a um banco de imagem de Bangladesh, outro país do oriente, sem relação com a empresa. https://www.gettyimages.com.br/fotos/no-child-labor-day-in-bangladesh

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1639268926142988289
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 780436A16DAF7033B413E10E5DA6330D6D45343792D707193FD5A95A103B2CC1
  • createdAtMillis - 1679715178588
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1639268926142988289780436A16DAF7033B413E10E5DA6330D6D45343792D707193FD5A95A103B2CC1