Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-24 14:42:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6745B794E9C46A45ABF33E250B5053EC684C28F888355F682E5F8899E2F65E28
Participant Details

Original Note:

As alegações do autor não são verificadas e não possuem fonte confiável de embasamento. A empresa acusada de trabalho infantil é chinesa, enquanto a imagem que ilustra as alegações, pertence a um banco de imagem de Bangladesh, outro país do oriente, sem relação com a empresa. https://www.gettyimages.com.br/fotos/no-child-labor-day-in-bangladesh

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1639268926142988289
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6745B794E9C46A45ABF33E250B5053EC684C28F888355F682E5F8899E2F65E28
  • createdAtMillis - 1679668923051
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16392689261429882896745B794E9C46A45ABF33E250B5053EC684C28F888355F682E5F8899E2F65E28