Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-24 15:29:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 78F9192F6B48843091C44973C9ACDCC27CAF208876CB76E5355162FF0CF2C408
Participant Details

Original Note:

False. Being a woman was never classified as a pre-existing condition nor was it solely the reason to deny a person insurance coverage but there were some pre-existing conditions that only affected women. Denial of coverage for pre-existing conditions is illegal by ACA. https://www.hhs.gov/healthcare/about-the-aca/pre-existing-conditions/index.html https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/issue-brief/pre-existing-condition-prevalence-among-women-under-age-65/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1639231884545671168
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 78F9192F6B48843091C44973C9ACDCC27CAF208876CB76E5355162FF0CF2C408
  • createdAtMillis - 1679671773567
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163923188454567116878F9192F6B48843091C44973C9ACDCC27CAF208876CB76E5355162FF0CF2C408