Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-24 08:34:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B1DAD3C65AF856E6280BED38A89947D487518D55C5E0CCE7EFA92C67DFF5560C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Title is misleading. The Arizona Supreme court vacated the dismissal of the claim about signature matches due to laches (filing too soon or too late) and ordered the trial court to examine the claim if the unmatched signatures could have made a probable difference.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1639139180511895552
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B1DAD3C65AF856E6280BED38A89947D487518D55C5E0CCE7EFA92C67DFF5560C
  • createdAtMillis - 1679646862619
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1639139180511895552B1DAD3C65AF856E6280BED38A89947D487518D55C5E0CCE7EFA92C67DFF5560C