Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-24 10:48:27 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A11D3833B90ABA1FB88B957F42A50087FC1EE5D084DEC70F38B438A43EC8D47B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Title is misleading. The Arizona Supreme court vacated the dismissal of the claim about signature matches due to laches (filing too soon or too late) and ordered the trial court to examine the claim if the unmatched signatures could have made a probable difference.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1639139180511895552
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A11D3833B90ABA1FB88B957F42A50087FC1EE5D084DEC70F38B438A43EC8D47B
  • createdAtMillis - 1679654907260
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1639139180511895552A11D3833B90ABA1FB88B957F42A50087FC1EE5D084DEC70F38B438A43EC8D47B