Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-23 22:10:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C1940130C5891AD957BB90E1C37AA5F55698BC6369DDBACAEF1B7BD99416DAFF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet was corrected to reflect the count sent back to the trial court. Thus the concerns of the proposed note were addressed and no notes are needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1638982596037165058
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C1940130C5891AD957BB90E1C37AA5F55698BC6369DDBACAEF1B7BD99416DAFF
  • createdAtMillis - 1679609459109
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1638982596037165058C1940130C5891AD957BB90E1C37AA5F55698BC6369DDBACAEF1B7BD99416DAFF