Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-23 19:31:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5F069138A0E7EC732B850FFD72D645D26702E88BC89434CA59761895ED204CA4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet was corrected to reflect the count sent back to the trial court. Thus the concerns of the proposed note were addressed and no notes are needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1638982596037165058
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5F069138A0E7EC732B850FFD72D645D26702E88BC89434CA59761895ED204CA4
  • createdAtMillis - 1679599901851
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16389825960371650585F069138A0E7EC732B850FFD72D645D26702E88BC89434CA59761895ED204CA4