Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-23 22:21:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 49F03E44FF052C73D09840423AA5B4BE3CEA820354E9EFF057796C719C9703D4
Participant Details

Original Note:

O tweet em questão trata de maneira desrespeitosa uma pessoa homossexual a chamando de "pet gay" por ser amigo da ex-primeira dama, levando em conta mais questões políticas do que a ética necessária para tal conteúdo "informativo".

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1638982364901646337
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 49F03E44FF052C73D09840423AA5B4BE3CEA820354E9EFF057796C719C9703D4
  • createdAtMillis - 1679610116905
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163898236490164633749F03E44FF052C73D09840423AA5B4BE3CEA820354E9EFF057796C719C9703D4