Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-24 14:47:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F293F253D87F8DB982E25D836A29713EAE3D63D5D934943EBB9F5658D17CA335
Participant Details

Original Note:

Clarifying context: insurers used pre-existing conditions that disproportionately affected women to deny them care. The justification wasn't solely because they were women. ACA protections got rid of this practice. https://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org/issues/health-care-equity/what-are-pre-existing-conditions#:~:text=How%20%E2%80%9CBeing%20a%20Woman%E2%80%9D%20Was,were%20considered%20pre%2Dexisting%20conditions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1638958965710286848
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F293F253D87F8DB982E25D836A29713EAE3D63D5D934943EBB9F5658D17CA335
  • createdAtMillis - 1679669263228
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1638958965710286848F293F253D87F8DB982E25D836A29713EAE3D63D5D934943EBB9F5658D17CA335