Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-23 11:01:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3EC19B1DCDF7C589EDF637085BA0E4FAF1FEC9D4EF92B2EBF0F002F9F396318F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Some community notes adds both the court documents and news reports relating to case & emphasizes only the news article in their community notes to support a narrative. This link below, directly from the court’s ruling would prove her statement to be true, on its own. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23720623-orderrepetitionforreview-4731530-0

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1638769320477233159
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3EC19B1DCDF7C589EDF637085BA0E4FAF1FEC9D4EF92B2EBF0F002F9F396318F
  • createdAtMillis - 1679569310875
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16387693204772331593EC19B1DCDF7C589EDF637085BA0E4FAF1FEC9D4EF92B2EBF0F002F9F396318F