Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-23 16:11:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 60806AB5446999A220E537B2A36CE3C4670564D81422E6380863B638FBFF0BAB
Participant Details

Original Note:

AZ Supreme Court didnt rule in favor of Lake. AZ's top court declined to hear her challenge. One of her claims was sent back to lower court to establish if enough votes were affected to alter the outcome of the election 'not simply by an untethered assertion of uncertainty.' https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23720623-orderrepetitionforreview-4731530-0?responsive=1&title=1?embed=true&responsive=false&sidebar=false https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/elections/2023/03/22/kari-lake-governor-election-challenge-mostly-rejected-by-arizona-supreme-court/70034889007/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1638758944184348672
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 60806AB5446999A220E537B2A36CE3C4670564D81422E6380863B638FBFF0BAB
  • createdAtMillis - 1679587909383
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163875894418434867260806AB5446999A220E537B2A36CE3C4670564D81422E6380863B638FBFF0BAB