Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-23 11:55:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 18876A020647510C747DB937CA31B415DCF9424F62448AB33FBCE7C16010369A
Participant Details

Original Note:

AZ Supreme Court didnt rule in favor of Lake. AZ's top court declined to hear her challenge. One of her claims was sent back to lower court to establish if enough votes were affected to alter the outcome of the election 'not simply by an untethered assertion of uncertainty.' https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23720623-orderrepetitionforreview-4731530-0?responsive=1&title=1?embed=true&responsive=false&sidebar=false https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/elections/2023/03/22/kari-lake-governor-election-challenge-mostly-rejected-by-arizona-supreme-court/70034889007/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1638758944184348672
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 18876A020647510C747DB937CA31B415DCF9424F62448AB33FBCE7C16010369A
  • createdAtMillis - 1679572546600
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 163875894418434867218876A020647510C747DB937CA31B415DCF9424F62448AB33FBCE7C16010369A