Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-23 23:56:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 05031392F216E768122D0D153AE941A4659928969F00E41C9377A34669061D03
Participant Details

Original Note:

AZ Supreme Court didnt rule in favor of Lake. AZ's top court declined to hear her challenge. One of her claims was sent back to lower court to establish if enough votes were affected to alter the outcome of the election 'not simply by an untethered assertion of uncertainty.' https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23720623-orderrepetitionforreview-4731530-0?responsive=1&title=1?embed=true&responsive=false&sidebar=false https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/elections/2023/03/22/kari-lake-governor-election-challenge-mostly-rejected-by-arizona-supreme-court/70034889007/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1638758944184348672
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 05031392F216E768122D0D153AE941A4659928969F00E41C9377A34669061D03
  • createdAtMillis - 1679615781381
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163875894418434867205031392F216E768122D0D153AE941A4659928969F00E41C9377A34669061D03