Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-23 17:10:58 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2086B368D035F327B84C07FF55CAD18B1452B9BD553B2F8EB662E9A1B4551EAE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The state's top court said six of her legal claims were properly dismissed by lower courts, but kept the case alive by sending one of Lake's claims back to a county judge to review. https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/elections/2023/03/22/kari-lake-governor-election-challenge-mostly-rejected-by-arizona-supreme-court/70034889007/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1638754447223566337
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 2086B368D035F327B84C07FF55CAD18B1452B9BD553B2F8EB662E9A1B4551EAE
createdAtMillis - 1679591458271
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 1
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 16387544472235663372086B368D035F327B84C07FF55CAD18B1452B9BD553B2F8EB662E9A1B4551EAE