Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-23 01:14:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AC902204F73D8022D6B5DECA71C4EC6C1F398B57C50CF7F53432C14782047607
Participant Details

Original Note:

people putting up community notes for this, shouldn't use the "evidence" from the previous case,the so-called evidence from that case and trying to tie it this indictment, is just silly and foolish. Anyone community note writers that try to use that, will be reported.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1638701825820966916
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AC902204F73D8022D6B5DECA71C4EC6C1F398B57C50CF7F53432C14782047607
  • createdAtMillis - 1679534041868
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1638701825820966916AC902204F73D8022D6B5DECA71C4EC6C1F398B57C50CF7F53432C14782047607