Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-23 02:00:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 95F7A3EB2A168CA64B3E872F9D7C23876AA4B35589501BF82B47671AC4AA3217
Participant Details

Original Note:

people putting up community notes for this, shouldn't use the "evidence" from the previous case,the so-called evidence from that case and trying to tie it this indictment, is just silly and foolish. Anyone community note writers that try to use that, will be reported.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1638701825820966916
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 95F7A3EB2A168CA64B3E872F9D7C23876AA4B35589501BF82B47671AC4AA3217
  • createdAtMillis - 1679536847396
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163870182582096691695F7A3EB2A168CA64B3E872F9D7C23876AA4B35589501BF82B47671AC4AA3217