Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-23 05:09:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7F43C984E1F6F70048EE21050AF1303F42CF2E518ED9DF8091E3590C364471D8
Participant Details

Original Note:

people putting up community notes for this, shouldn't use the "evidence" from the previous case,the so-called evidence from that case and trying to tie it this indictment, is just silly and foolish. Anyone community note writers that try to use that, will be reported.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1638701825820966916
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7F43C984E1F6F70048EE21050AF1303F42CF2E518ED9DF8091E3590C364471D8
  • createdAtMillis - 1679548174384
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16387018258209669167F43C984E1F6F70048EE21050AF1303F42CF2E518ED9DF8091E3590C364471D8