Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-23 01:17:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 401E20090C8F45C29392131A9F9F7F5B8E99F5E338FC76A5AC1CA2D5C90BB894
Participant Details

Original Note:

people putting up community notes for this, shouldn't use the "evidence" from the previous case,the so-called evidence from that case and trying to tie it this indictment, is just silly and foolish. Anyone community note writers that try to use that, will be reported.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1638701825820966916
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 401E20090C8F45C29392131A9F9F7F5B8E99F5E338FC76A5AC1CA2D5C90BB894
  • createdAtMillis - 1679534257461
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1638701825820966916401E20090C8F45C29392131A9F9F7F5B8E99F5E338FC76A5AC1CA2D5C90BB894