Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-22 12:12:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4BAB515CF923FCBD63F45E0FE5264A5A6CBA7E6CA88A573869299FDD37241EDC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Notes claiming this Tweet is misleading are themselves misleading in their misrepresentation of the Tweet’s claims. Suggest further review of the full Tweet thread and analysis link provided. https://twitter.com/twittersafety/status/1638262034864263188?s=12 https://www.sprinklr.com/blog/identify-toxic-content-with-leading-analytical-ai/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1638371227256381442
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 4BAB515CF923FCBD63F45E0FE5264A5A6CBA7E6CA88A573869299FDD37241EDC
createdAtMillis - 1679487127455
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 16383712272563814424BAB515CF923FCBD63F45E0FE5264A5A6CBA7E6CA88A573869299FDD37241EDC