Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-22 02:11:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 84A7C8C1462EEAB26C6B691DD96D24DD01F0D099120A0274238EB7D7988997E0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Não se trata de anulação de provas por inconsistência. Os processos foram anulados por ter havido orientação entre juiz e acusação e porque a competência não era da jurisdição de Curitiba e sim de Brasília. Precisa de nota, mas estou com preguiça.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1638353560600469512
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 84A7C8C1462EEAB26C6B691DD96D24DD01F0D099120A0274238EB7D7988997E0
  • createdAtMillis - 1679451105186
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 163835356060046951284A7C8C1462EEAB26C6B691DD96D24DD01F0D099120A0274238EB7D7988997E0