Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-22 03:02:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7702C02C6719D814F37DDC31C0EDED7D3A4D4B3A7A648B0E25B4857A8EDEE6FC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter is presenting data. Just because someone else has a different data does not mean twitters data is invalid, especially for something as subjective/unscientific as “identifying hate speech”. If you think your data is better, put it in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1638312768016351232
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7702C02C6719D814F37DDC31C0EDED7D3A4D4B3A7A648B0E25B4857A8EDEE6FC
  • createdAtMillis - 1679454151088
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16383127680163512327702C02C6719D814F37DDC31C0EDED7D3A4D4B3A7A648B0E25B4857A8EDEE6FC