Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-28 03:51:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EE056A4D3F8F42FC1CB0EE8E94CCE8C4AB71426C32F06395ABC4ED68B8CFB1FC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The analysis only examined tweets containing >=1 of 300 slurs identified by Twitter. Since not all hate speech involves the use of slurs, it is misleading to draw conclusions about hate speech generally based on this analysis. The list of slurs has also not been published. https://www.sprinklr.com/blog/identify-toxic-content-with-leading-analytical-ai/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1638293579842871299
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EE056A4D3F8F42FC1CB0EE8E94CCE8C4AB71426C32F06395ABC4ED68B8CFB1FC
  • createdAtMillis - 1679975519161
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1638293579842871299EE056A4D3F8F42FC1CB0EE8E94CCE8C4AB71426C32F06395ABC4ED68B8CFB1FC