Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-22 00:28:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9076E199D277D4161059C6A796BAC502E6BB9C6A52A1529B3052ED1640FCED67
Participant Details

Original Note:

The analysis only examined tweets containing >=1 of 300 slurs identified by Twitter. Since not all hate speech involves the use of slurs, it is misleading to draw conclusions about hate speech generally based on this analysis. The list of slurs has also not been published. https://www.sprinklr.com/blog/identify-toxic-content-with-leading-analytical-ai/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1638293579842871299
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9076E199D277D4161059C6A796BAC502E6BB9C6A52A1529B3052ED1640FCED67
  • createdAtMillis - 1679444928661
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16382935798428712999076E199D277D4161059C6A796BAC502E6BB9C6A52A1529B3052ED1640FCED67