Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-22 00:32:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 76F4A28A37FC3E01E6732B59A1156CF72F91DD8347E0A8247C74DE71E1D53D26
Participant Details

Original Note:

The analysis only examined tweets containing >=1 of 300 slurs identified by Twitter. Since not all hate speech involves the use of slurs, it is misleading to draw conclusions about hate speech generally based on this analysis. The list of slurs has also not been published. https://www.sprinklr.com/blog/identify-toxic-content-with-leading-analytical-ai/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1638293579842871299
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 76F4A28A37FC3E01E6732B59A1156CF72F91DD8347E0A8247C74DE71E1D53D26
  • createdAtMillis - 1679445132033
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163829357984287129976F4A28A37FC3E01E6732B59A1156CF72F91DD8347E0A8247C74DE71E1D53D26