Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-21 22:42:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 668A38E6FBD833A6E562EE64D2897E9ABCDBD2ADCD94E7AA4EA39D1A5B622C71
Participant Details

Original Note:

The analysis only examined tweets containing >=1 of 300 slurs identified by Twitter. Since not all hate speech involves the use of slurs, it is misleading to draw conclusions about hate speech generally based on this analysis. The list of slurs has also not been published. https://www.sprinklr.com/blog/identify-toxic-content-with-leading-analytical-ai/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1638293579842871299
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 668A38E6FBD833A6E562EE64D2897E9ABCDBD2ADCD94E7AA4EA39D1A5B622C71
  • createdAtMillis - 1679438526746
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1638293579842871299668A38E6FBD833A6E562EE64D2897E9ABCDBD2ADCD94E7AA4EA39D1A5B622C71