Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-21 22:19:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 26C40FD5C274AE2437DE9E2717DBF630CF611C5406A6150217A367922B852F5F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The analysis only examined tweets containing >=1 of 300 slurs identified by Twitter. Since not all hate speech involves the use of slurs, it is misleading to draw conclusions about hate speech generally based on this analysis. The list of slurs has also not been published. https://www.sprinklr.com/blog/identify-toxic-content-with-leading-analytical-ai/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1638293579842871299
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 26C40FD5C274AE2437DE9E2717DBF630CF611C5406A6150217A367922B852F5F
  • createdAtMillis - 1679437195446
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 163829357984287129926C40FD5C274AE2437DE9E2717DBF630CF611C5406A6150217A367922B852F5F