Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-21 03:53:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CD4462E0ADDDC34E6C49FD22579E48A59F780AAEB9CE2CA216C1301497E6C8A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The cited article does not mention H. erectus or H. habilis. In fact, the authors state that the identity of the archaic introgression is currently unknown. Also, only two African populations were shown w/this introgression rather than all "present day sub-Saharan Africans". https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aax5097

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1638005498334281729
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CD4462E0ADDDC34E6C49FD22579E48A59F780AAEB9CE2CA216C1301497E6C8A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1679370823451
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1638005498334281729CD4462E0ADDDC34E6C49FD22579E48A59F780AAEB9CE2CA216C1301497E6C8A5