Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-21 05:28:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B289B7B9A72A2B21A5016714B5CFECC892B67D4EF528AD49D229201250F7B83A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The cited article does not mention H. erectus or H. habilis. In fact, the authors state that the identity of the archaic introgression is currently unknown. Also, only two African populations were shown w/this introgression rather than all "present day sub-Saharan Africans". https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aax5097

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1638005498334281729
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B289B7B9A72A2B21A5016714B5CFECC892B67D4EF528AD49D229201250F7B83A
  • createdAtMillis - 1679376489433
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1638005498334281729B289B7B9A72A2B21A5016714B5CFECC892B67D4EF528AD49D229201250F7B83A