Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-29 21:59:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3907CB0578FD8C09FDBE03E32AAD3393F40F376D65F07B6D6DC638556FA1CC44
Participant Details

Original Note:

money was returned, it was judged by several groups of judges, by a minister. a Technical detail should not cancel the entire charge.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1637978004927160320
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3907CB0578FD8C09FDBE03E32AAD3393F40F376D65F07B6D6DC638556FA1CC44
  • createdAtMillis - 1690667970498
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16379780049271603203907CB0578FD8C09FDBE03E32AAD3393F40F376D65F07B6D6DC638556FA1CC44