Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-23 14:57:44 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A7CF216432B07474BCE994D67BBDC14D849765023B5C4E9BBA7E0F5A7BE16539
Participant Details

Original Note:

Until we have a legitimate epidemiologist or vaccinologist on this panel, I'd suggest that we let Twitter users openly debate this issue without adding notes from people who aren't professional medical specialists. No note is needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1637604472590417922
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A7CF216432B07474BCE994D67BBDC14D849765023B5C4E9BBA7E0F5A7BE16539
  • createdAtMillis - 1679583464391
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1637604472590417922A7CF216432B07474BCE994D67BBDC14D849765023B5C4E9BBA7E0F5A7BE16539