Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-21 14:23:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D4CED98866A8C40AA19F63B54D6E6684BA017428028C07F46F6F4CA14FC52481
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet expresses opinion in an ongoing public debate. Opinions are subjective and debatable by nature. Community Notes is not intended as a mechanism for imposing partiality in public discourse. Counterarguments should be replies and not community notes. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1637157704429887489
participantId -
raterParticipantId - D4CED98866A8C40AA19F63B54D6E6684BA017428028C07F46F6F4CA14FC52481
createdAtMillis - 1679408606654
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1637157704429887489D4CED98866A8C40AA19F63B54D6E6684BA017428028C07F46F6F4CA14FC52481