Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-18 03:30:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2986CFEE50971978EDD97587242E77A0ED53A4DD99A5C92DF4DC0DFF5ADA0F9F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet expresses opinion in an ongoing public debate. Opinions are subjective and debatable by nature. Community Notes is not intended as a mechanism of imposing partiality in public discourse. Counterarguments should be replies and not community notes. ◘ https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples ◘ https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1636892710224252928
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 2986CFEE50971978EDD97587242E77A0ED53A4DD99A5C92DF4DC0DFF5ADA0F9F
createdAtMillis - 1679110238650
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 16368927102242529282986CFEE50971978EDD97587242E77A0ED53A4DD99A5C92DF4DC0DFF5ADA0F9F