Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-17 19:26:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2DD40F5D40D3105F1AAC2E9F5FACCD5761437F8774C55FE869AE0FCF0D9D3136
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original tweet does not claim that the finding is conclusive proof of the origin of SARS-CoV-2. The original tweet is accurate and no note is needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636761320006598662
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2DD40F5D40D3105F1AAC2E9F5FACCD5761437F8774C55FE869AE0FCF0D9D3136
  • createdAtMillis - 1679081169299
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16367613200065986622DD40F5D40D3105F1AAC2E9F5FACCD5761437F8774C55FE869AE0FCF0D9D3136