Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-18 00:54:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CCC328C7A178EFC4AB919FD27F98EEA9BF503F6BB67655DBD67A0716C0E0EFC9
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. It is even directly quoting an opposing viewpoint. If you want to argue the validity of the vaccine, do it in the appropriate place.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636748939855626240
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CCC328C7A178EFC4AB919FD27F98EEA9BF503F6BB67655DBD67A0716C0E0EFC9
  • createdAtMillis - 1679100868922
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1636748939855626240CCC328C7A178EFC4AB919FD27F98EEA9BF503F6BB67655DBD67A0716C0E0EFC9