Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-17 23:06:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B0F61C124EDC95596905EF13B95A7EC0EF1BBE50E02FC7EA398E336BDB6260ED
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. It is even directly quoting an opposing viewpoint. If you want to argue the validity of the vaccine, do it in the appropriate place.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636748939855626240
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B0F61C124EDC95596905EF13B95A7EC0EF1BBE50E02FC7EA398E336BDB6260ED
  • createdAtMillis - 1679094394050
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1636748939855626240B0F61C124EDC95596905EF13B95A7EC0EF1BBE50E02FC7EA398E336BDB6260ED