Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-17 23:16:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3DB9A9BFA8F7A17A52D354D21DF008C4029727F3E8F4E6B7CD1449831C73A204
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. It is even directly quoting an opposing viewpoint. If you want to argue the validity of the vaccine, do it in the appropriate place.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636748939855626240
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3DB9A9BFA8F7A17A52D354D21DF008C4029727F3E8F4E6B7CD1449831C73A204
  • createdAtMillis - 1679094993626
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16367489398556262403DB9A9BFA8F7A17A52D354D21DF008C4029727F3E8F4E6B7CD1449831C73A204