Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-18 00:20:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 07EC0A8C631488B45E8C6188735CEAC5D0D9E18D85CD4F17E422053E3488CB44
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. It is even directly quoting an opposing viewpoint. If you want to argue the validity of the vaccine, do it in the appropriate place.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636748939855626240
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 07EC0A8C631488B45E8C6188735CEAC5D0D9E18D85CD4F17E422053E3488CB44
  • createdAtMillis - 1679098858576
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163674893985562624007EC0A8C631488B45E8C6188735CEAC5D0D9E18D85CD4F17E422053E3488CB44