Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-18 01:06:09 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DC20B837545E6EC5F165E58FEA0E1FEA6E2DDCEE612A74C544548D413BE020FA
Participant Details

Original Note:

This note makes a factually true claim. What the Disinformation Governance Board actually did later, and whether it's official narratives about itself can be trusted, is in question. The Twitter Files are direct evidence on this, and history suggests cause for concern.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636738132128460801
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DC20B837545E6EC5F165E58FEA0E1FEA6E2DDCEE612A74C544548D413BE020FA
  • createdAtMillis - 1679101569353
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1636738132128460801DC20B837545E6EC5F165E58FEA0E1FEA6E2DDCEE612A74C544548D413BE020FA