Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-19 13:48:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B228CFDAAC8B4A3FBA9EF7BA0D93D6F3CD5D0D7556D5A9CA236D7C5B7E10EA99
Participant Details

Original Note:

This note makes a factually true claim. What the Disinformation Governance Board actually did later, and whether it's official narratives about itself can be trusted, is in question. The Twitter Files are direct evidence on this, and history suggests cause for concern.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636738132128460801
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B228CFDAAC8B4A3FBA9EF7BA0D93D6F3CD5D0D7556D5A9CA236D7C5B7E10EA99
  • createdAtMillis - 1679233711683
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1636738132128460801B228CFDAAC8B4A3FBA9EF7BA0D93D6F3CD5D0D7556D5A9CA236D7C5B7E10EA99