Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-17 23:35:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A30E23B01F927C4387616E33DE422C96B4F9A9B45B8ACA619267391F3D77B5A8
Participant Details

Original Note:

This note makes a factually true claim. What the Disinformation Governance Board actually did later, and whether it's official narratives about itself can be trusted, is in question. The Twitter Files are direct evidence on this, and history suggests cause for concern.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636738132128460801
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A30E23B01F927C4387616E33DE422C96B4F9A9B45B8ACA619267391F3D77B5A8
  • createdAtMillis - 1679096125140
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1636738132128460801A30E23B01F927C4387616E33DE422C96B4F9A9B45B8ACA619267391F3D77B5A8