Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-17 18:37:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6FBB85D745383A9F0E13F771B5C28F6A0C034A21B3B35B009E504B745A5A1864
Participant Details

Original Note:

This note makes a factually true claim. What the Disinformation Governance Board actually did later, and whether it's official narratives about itself can be trusted, is in question. The Twitter Files are direct evidence on this, and history suggests cause for concern.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636738132128460801
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6FBB85D745383A9F0E13F771B5C28F6A0C034A21B3B35B009E504B745A5A1864
  • createdAtMillis - 1679078239224
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16367381321284608016FBB85D745383A9F0E13F771B5C28F6A0C034A21B3B35B009E504B745A5A1864