Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-17 14:55:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2201774B3552B984E38D3B2D7820213B097889C82FB3B3E5C5903CB1A2257D3A
Participant Details

Original Note:

This note makes a factually true claim. What the Disinformation Governance Board actually did later, and whether it's official narratives about itself can be trusted, is in question. The Twitter Files are direct evidence on this, and history suggests cause for concern.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636738132128460801
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2201774B3552B984E38D3B2D7820213B097889C82FB3B3E5C5903CB1A2257D3A
  • createdAtMillis - 1679064934974
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16367381321284608012201774B3552B984E38D3B2D7820213B097889C82FB3B3E5C5903CB1A2257D3A