Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-19 18:15:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C5E0C9C555734997902F2CC672D3C6F98AD9A5C92580B6A5A72B3B3D6B1B9696
Participant Details

Original Note:

The report does not conclude that raccoon dogs were the vector from which humans became infected with COVID19. It concludes only that an animal vector is plausible (without establishing the species or conditions of transmission.) NYTs own article archived due to paywalling. https://archive.ph/n5vS4

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636665151796523014
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C5E0C9C555734997902F2CC672D3C6F98AD9A5C92580B6A5A72B3B3D6B1B9696
  • createdAtMillis - 1679249719275
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1636665151796523014C5E0C9C555734997902F2CC672D3C6F98AD9A5C92580B6A5A72B3B3D6B1B9696